Swan did, however,
identify two important issues. First, hunting has historically
been a part of the American way of life, and second, wildlife
management is important, isn't for the fainthearted, and is distasteful
to some.
In contrast with Swan, Johnson spoke in temperate
tones as he provided a thoughtful analysis of the future of hunting.
An ardent hunter and fisherman since age eight, he saw that the
sport had declined principally because hunters' gaze had shifted
from the target and because of a failure to recognize the impact
of demographic shifts. "Hunters aren't adapting to urbanization,"
he said. "If we wish to save this legacy, we must react to the
changes around us."
Johnson made the case that the critical focus
of the NRA--protecting the rights of those who wish to bear weapons
of near mass destruction--was losing the battle for hunters in the
cities, where the votes are. In Johnson's view, the animal rights
movement has polarized the discussion about hunting by going to
urban audiences and depicting hunters as brutal trophy collectors
rather than the simple sportsmen, habitat stewards, and conservationists
they tend to be. Then he argued for conciliation: "Animal rights
groups don't want animals to suffer, nor do we, so there is a commonality."
Lastly, Johnson spoke of a need for education
about resource management. Children should be taught about the
need for people to maintain sustainable wildlife population levels,
rather than being left to assume that population dynamics just
work themselves out. He did not mention examples, but his point
is illustrated by the current debate over controlling wild pig
populations that are tearing up native plants and frightening people,
and sea lions whose growing populations' territorial needs conflict
with the growing human population's desire for access to beaches
and docks.
Bolstering Johnson's case that hunting is in decline,
Treanor noted that license sales are dropping and consequently
cutting off revenue for resource management. He suggested that
the rise of extremism in both the hunting and nonhunting conservationist
communities may be a symptom of a loss of connection to the land.
"We'll change for the worse if we lose that connection," he argued.
"Now that society is more urban, and children are growing up where
the only wildlife they see is in zoos or on Disney, the outlook
for a broadly held and realistic understanding of wildlife management
is becoming more elusive."
The discussion in that room did not resolve the
problem, but it summed up the current predicament pretty well--as
did the audience: all hunters, with nary an environmentalist ally
in sight.
|