| Ebb & Flow |
||||
Funding for Sustainable Fisheries, Ocean Research The $2-million grant is seed money for Environmental Defense’s new California Fisheries Fund, which will offer loans to fishing communities, groups, associations, and businesses attempting to make their fishing practices more environmentally and economically sustainable. When the Fund is fully capitalized, loans will be offered to:
Environmental Defense (ED) will manage the Fisheries Fund with the assistance of ShoreBank Enterprise Pacific, a nonprofit community development financial institution. ED will use Conservancy money to help raise an additional $6 million from private sources, for a total $8 million in capital for the Fund’s start-up phase. The Conservancy’s $1-million grant for research, authorized by the Ocean Protection Council (OPC), is to the California Sea Grant College Program and University of Southern California Sea Grant Program for studies on climate change impacts on the state’s ocean and coastal resources. Proposals that might qualify for funding include studies on the effects of sea-level rise on coastal habitat, or how changes in ocean conditions such as acidity, temperature, and circulation might affect ocean food webs. Projects selected for funding will begin in 2008 and run through 2010. This is the second round of OPC-related research funding to be administered by Sea Grant; the first round, also totaling $1 million, was provided by the Conservancy in 2005 for projects running from 2007 to 2009. “Green Solution” Studied Community Conservancy International (CCI), a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization, has proposed a “Green Solution” that would remove concrete and asphalt and retrofit existing parks to create a network of unpaved areas onto which runoff could be diverted to allow soil and plants to filter and naturally clean toxins. These areas could either be existing green space in parks and open spaces where water filtration technologies like underground cisterns could be installed, or publicly owned land that is now paved but could be restored to green space. A parking lot inside a park, for example, could be replaced by materials that allow water to filter into the ground. Paved lands along creeks and rivers could be restored and planted. The areas comprising the Green Solution network would not only mitigate water-quality problems but also diminish flood hazards, provide more green space for nearby residents, and allow for new trails and other recreation features. CCI is conducting a study to quantify how much land is needed in each watershed to maximize the effectiveness of the Green Solution. The organization is working with hydrologists, engineers, digital mappers, regional and state agencies, and others to identify how much land would be required to make a measurable difference in water quality, and where that land would need to be. The study is under way now and expected to be completed by the end of this year. The March allocation is added to $100,000 from the Conservancy in November 2006. Mapping Maverick’s Seafloor The images were created by the California Coast State Waters Mapping Project using technology that bounces sound off the seafloor, revealing a level of detail that has never been captured before (see Coast & Ocean, Vol. 21, No. 3). They document underwater habitat types and geological formations, and can be used by researchers to study natural processes such as underwater faults and sediment transport systems, which play an important role in coastal erosion and beach formation. The images can also be used to identify potential hazards, such as which areas are most at risk for tsunamis, and--perhaps most important--will serve as a baseline against which researchers can measure changes in habitats and formations. The State Waters Mapping Project was initiated to survey all of California’s coastal seafloor out to the three-mile state waters boundary, to identify habitats, and help determine which areas should be set aside for protection under the Marine Life Protection Act. The Project’s first survey, which covered much of the area between Año Nuevo and Point Arena (the nearshore portion of the seafloor from Bolinas north to Point Arena has not yet been surveyed), generated the Maverick’s images and also documented the position and physical features associated with the marine segments of the San Gregorio fault, a major branch of the San Andreas fault system. Research for the Mapping Project is being conducted collaboratively by Fugro Pelagos, Inc., California State University, Monterey Bay, Center for Habitat Studies Moss Landing Marine Labs, and the U. S. Geological Survey. It is supported by the California Ocean Protection Council, the Conservancy, Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Geological Survey, Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, and NOAA National Marine Sanctuary Program. Spartina Infestation Contained Since 2000, the Conservancy has spent $7,772,507 on ISP, most of which came from various grants. In March it approved an additional $1,250,868 grant of Wildlife Conservation Board funds for treatment projects. The Conservancy also approved $949,907 to operate and manage the regionally coordinated project through spring 2008. Native California cordgrass, Spartina foliosa, is an important component of marsh ecosystems. But the three species that were introduced to San Francisco Bay starting in the 1970s are highly invasive, spreading at a greater than exponential rate and altering the physical structure and biological composition of marshes, mudflats, and creeks. Non-native invasive spartina converts mudflats to cordgrass meadows and fills in channels and sloughs, destroying habitat for native plants and animals and disrupting marsh hydrology. One species in particular, Spartina alterniflora, hybridizes with the native Spartina foliosa, and has invaded every marsh restoration project in the south and central San Francisco Bay Estuary in the past 15 years. (See Coast & Ocean, Vol. 16, No. 2 and Vol. 19, No. 2 for more about the history and impacts of the spartina invasion.) In the 1990s biologists began to realize the extent of the invasion, and in 2000 the Conservancy established ISP to coordinate eradication efforts among federal, state, and local agencies and organizations. In 2004, ISP partners began to apply mechanical and chemical treatment to infested acres. The following year, 1,010 acres--67 percent of the infestation at that time--were treated in just over a month. In 2006, 94 percent of the acreage estimated to be infested with spartina was treated. Early observations suggest that the 2006 effort killed 70 to 90 percent of the weed in treated areas. Now that invasive spartina’s spread has been contained, ISP partners can focus on eradication. All remaining untreated stands--most of them in hard-to-reach areas--will be treated, and sites will be revisited as necessary. |
||||
|
||||