featured articles READ ABOUT US subscribe click here for home page about us
 
Sinkyone Solo
Hiking the Lost Coast with the ghost of Edward Abbey

Bennett Barthelemy
Shifting Baselines
A scientist's idea of "normal" can be distorted by failure to look back in time

Anne Canright
Restoration and Global Change
Research ecologist Nathan Stephenson raises thorny questions

Eileen Ecklund

The Rush to Build Desalting Plants
Several hotly debated proposals to extract drinking water from the ocean are moving forward

Rasa Gustaitis

The Russian River: El Rio Peligroso
Drowning deaths spur bilingual water safety programs in Sonoma County

Deborah Hirst
The View from Noyo Bridge
A coastal citizen tells of the long but successful battle for see-through railings

Vince Taylor

coastal viewpoint
Sam's Page
Paying to Share Could End the Race to Fish
Coastal Conservancy News
coastal viewpoint
The Leading Edge of the Past
our gallery
Poems
Photographs
other publications
Useful Sources
tile
coastal_conservancy_home back issues links our gallery contact us
banner photo
 

| home | print page | email to a friend |

1
Restoration and Global Change
< | 1 | 2 |

stephenson photo

You hear a lot of talk among restorationists these days about "building ecosystem resistance and resilience" to try to maintain native biodiversity within ecosystems. What are some of the things you can do to achieve that?

NS: In some cases there are some really obvious things you can do. I'm going to talk about what I know best, which is forests here in the Sierra Nevada. Many forests have become unusually dense due to a century of fire exclusion. By thinning those forests--whether by prescribed fire or mechanical thinning--you can increase their resistance and resilience to air pollution and . . . you name it. I can't think of a stress where an overly dense forest doesn't benefit if it's thinned. In a national park, the main way you get a forest to be thinner is by prescribed fire. It tends to kill the smallest trees and open up things a little more, and there's less competition among the trees, and those that remain tend to be healthier and grow faster. In other areas it may be more appropriate to go in with chainsaws and thin out the smaller trees--I know that's a political hot-button issue, but just about everything is these days.

So you are suggesting that instead of trying to replicate ecosystems, you have to take the lessons you've learned from the past systems and try to apply them on the ground as conditions change?

NS: Yes. I still think we need to look to the past to understand how ecosystems work; we definitely have to keep learning about how ecosystems respond to climate, to fire, to all these different things, and one of the best ways to do that is to look at the past. Maybe as we develop a better understanding of how ecosystems work, we'll be in a better position to conserve native biodiversity into the future.

Is there anything beyond thinning that you're looking at that might help the forests?

NS: No, not currently. The main reason I've been giving talks about this is to get more people to be thinking along those lines, about what we can do, because I certainly don't claim I have the answers. I'm just trying to pose the questions.

 

 

 

  home < | 1 | 2 |  
Send Feedback and Back to Top back to top send feedback

bottom navigation site map contact us privacy policy terms of use submission guidelines subscribe index coastal conservancy website coastal conservancy website privacy policy site map contact us privacy policy terms of use submission guidelines subscribe index past issues conservancy site privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy privacy policy contact us privacy policy terms of use submission guidelines subscribe index

Copyright 2006 © California Coastal Conservancy All Rights Reserved